Showing posts with label Energy Department. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Energy Department. Show all posts

Monday, September 21, 2009

Federal Energy Saving Performance Contracts Come Under Scrutiny

Taxpayers spent $850,000 for "energy savings" at four federal government buildings in the Energy Department's Oak Ridge, Tennessee research complex during the four years since the buildings were demolished, another $650,000 over six years for energy conservation at a high efficiency laundry facility in Texas which was closed and standing idle, and $11.5 million more than necessary to various local utility companies where government bureaucrats and contracting officials failed to use expensive mechanical and software systems installed to automatically turn down the heat in government office buildings at night, according to findings in a recently released Energy Department inspector general audit report.

the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act appropriated nearly $17 billion to the Energy Department's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, which has issued 16 "Super ESPC" agreements which could cost taxpayers as much as $80 billion over the next 25 years. Under these agreements, contractors continue receiving energy efficiency performance bonuses long after construction is complete, if building performance continues to meet the specified energy standards. The audit report notes that lack of oversight and clear accounting for ESPC contracts makes it hard to figure out whether the concept really saves any money for taxpayers over the long haul.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Bingaman Dings Energy Department, Pushes Renewable Power Generation

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Jeff Bingaman is threatening to introduce legislation establishing a Clean Energy Deployment Administration to oversee loan s and guarantees for development of new energy technologies, because the Department of Energy has not yet approved a single loan application under the program established in 2005. Four years and nary a dollar spent. Whoa!

Meanwhile, construction of power generation facilities using alternative sources of energy is being held up while Bingaman's committee debates the question whether it should mandate 255 renewable energy production by 2025, as Bingaman and the Democrats insist, or only 155, as Republicans propose. House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman is putting forth an alternative proposition of 17.5% renewable energy, with 10% improvement in the efficiency of power production overall. Until this Congressional debate is resolved, power production facility designers will remain unable to envision the power plant of the future, and power facility construction will remain at a standstill.